Sunday, June 23, 2019

Reflection Post: Week 5



Blog Entry Week Five

Description
This week in EDAT 6114 we discussed the constructivist approach to instruction. This theory is all about instruction being student-centered and incorporating discovery and discussion. The chapter we read summarized the idea of the constructivist approach as well as discussed how to effectively use the practices and strategies that go with student-centered instruction. 

Analysis
            Slavin (2018) begins the chapter by defining constructivist theory as “the idea that learners must individually discover and transform complex information if they are to make it their own” (p. 188). In this method of teaching, students gain a more active role and the teacher’s becomes more of a moderator or guide. Vygotsky was one of the theorists who influenced constructivist instruction through social learning, the zone of proximal development, cognitive apprenticeship, and mediated learning (Slavin, 2018). Social learning is the idea that children learn through experiences and interactions with people who are more knowledgeable. This can be done through cooperative learning and discussion. The zone of proximal development “marks the range of tasks the child might not be able to do alone but can do with the assistance of peers or adults”, and when participating in cooperative learning students are likely working within this zone (Slavin, 2018, p. 189). Vygosky’s next concept, cognitive apprenticeship, refers to the idea of a student learning through interactions with an expert, whether that is a child or an adult. This is very similar to social learning, but the focus is more on the fact that a student is learning from someone who is considered an expert and uses the expertise they gain to work through complex tasks. This is another place where cooperative learning, and particularly peer tutoring, is helpful. The final concept Slavin (2018) discussed from Vygotsky is mediated learning. This concept is synonymous to scaffolding, and requires that students receive adequate support throughout the activities they are completing. All four of these components are present in the constructivist approach.
            Slavin (2018) goes on to explain that constructivist approach is about “top-down” thinking where students begin with a difficult task and work with teacher guidance to “discover the basic skills required” (p. 190). As a result of the complexity of the tasks and activities, students will need the support of their teacher and each other in order to come to conclusions and discover the skills required. The peer interaction piece provides students with the opportunity to talk through their ideas and clear up misconceptions.
            Another part of student centered learning that is so important is questioning. The focus on discovery requires students to come up with questions and push to answer the questions that they have. The idea of reciprocal teaching involves a teacher working with a small group of students in order to model questioning and encourage students to practice questioning each other in the same manner. The teacher moves from a leader to facilitator as the students begin to do the questioning (Slavin, 2018).
            There are several ways for teachers to integrate student centered learning in their classrooms. Some of these include jigsaws, project-based learning, and think pair shares. Each of these activities presents opportunities for critical thinking and discovery.
Reflection
            This week’s topic was particularly interesting to me because I do a lot of student centered learning in my room and really value what it does for my students. I attended a conference on Instructional Conversations last year and the whole idea is that students become the leaders while the teacher takes a back seat as on observer. At first, I was very hesitant to hand the reins to my students, so to speak. I worried that they wouldn’t stay on task or get much from the experience. However, after discussing our class norms, choosing conversation goals, and splitting my students into groups for the first time, they proved me wrong. I heard my students having deep conversations and making connections I hadn’t expected.  They were actually listening to each other and using each other’s ideas as a springboard.  My students made connections across content areas, and remembered the things they discussed together a lot longer than when I had just presented the content in a whole group setting.
            Students make better connections and gain more knowledge when they are invested and engaged. Student-centered learning focuses on providing those opportunities through things like project based learning and frequent chances for discussion. Using this form of instruction allows students to take charge and learn new things through questioning and discovery, rather than just by being told what is true or not. I believe that student centered learning should absolutely be a part of every classroom. This will create independent students who have a desire to learn and discover more. Student centered learning also creates opportunities for students to learn from each other, forming relationships and social skills at the same time. While teacher led instruction has its place in the classroom, constructivist theory is essential to encouraging our students to being active learners and take control of their learning.


Reference 
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.).     Boston, MA: Pearson Education.


No comments:

Post a Comment